
Footprint taken at Temby footage site.The zoo kepper in the interview said, disingenously, it did not match any animal there.So What.?Its a large cat print.If he did not know that, they must have been interviewing one of the administration staff.
This is the only video on the net of this interview that we did with Kurt.We filmed Kurt and then broke the story to the papers in June 2005 when we met Kurt Engel and looked at the 26" tail.Bernie Mace was brought in and sampled a piece of tail for Mitochondrial DNA , which came back f.catus, wild domestic cat.This test was paid for by the Sunday Herald Sun in Melbourne.The tail and photos were examined by Melbourne Museum where one of the biologists stated that the tail was real and not a "trick cut".We have never released the most crucial photo which shows the animal at the crack of dawn hanging up next to the verandah posts near nails.I was able to measure the post and it confirmed that the animal was as large as Kurt claimed.Here is one of the photos.We have not given away the best photo since we want something for the book .The "hidden" photo shows the animal next to the post and meant we could measure the animal against nails on the post.
For more information see wikipedia
Its helps if we know the difference between a dog and a cat footprint.On the left is a dog print, notice nails are out, the two front toes are sort of in line, and the rear pad shape.And the shape of the toes.
Now we see a cat print, the give away are 3 lobes at the back of the plantar lobe(rear pad)the top of the plantar lobe(flat)the shape of the toes and the no nails.And the uneven alignment of the front toes.Note-dogs do not always leave nail marks, and sometimes, cats will leave nails...Australian substrate is so dry it is very hard to get decent prints of Australian big cats.!